SWEET REVENGE

It was the late local news I tuned in to hear Sunday night. What was spread across my television screen was the welcome news that Osama Bin Laden had been killed by American special forces in a daring raid on his Pakistan compound. It was a fitting end for the Saudi millionaire who used his wealth to wrought only mayhem and suffering in his 54 years. His murderous legacy was the dispiriting loss of the sense of security we Americans enjoyed before that fateful day in September, 2001. And the disquieting knowledge that our world had forever changed.
Gratitude, and perhaps a few metals, are due the brave band of 40 for ridding the world of a barbarously iconic figure.
And that gratitude must also be extended to President Obama, who made a valiant decision to send in special opts instead of missiles, to insure Bin Laden was sent winging toward those promised 70 virgins. Had the mission failed, Mr. Obama risked suffering the same disparaging fate at the hands of historians, not-to-mention voters, as did Jimmy Carter in his failed effort to free American hostages in Iran in 1980.
The United States has finally meted out the revenge promised by former president George Bush standing amidst the smoldering rubble of the fallen towers.
May God continue to give succor to the grieving families of those who perished on 9/11. And may He continue to bless this great country, its military and its president, in whom we take such pride for a job well and bravely done.

GOING RED

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts changed it political color Tuesday night from blue to red. The Republican won - decisively. That may put a blue pall over the White House and leave a few faces red with embarrassment. President Obama's for one. The senator-elect from the Bay state, Scott Brown, put it best in his exuberant acceptance speech when he said Air Force One made an "emergency" landing in Massachusetts to no avail for loser Martha Coakely.

More important, the Democrat thrashing in Massachusetts already has left so-called blue dog Democrats like Evan Bayh finding excuses to back away from the monstrosity of a healthcare bill, that up until the Massachusetts rout, Bayh had steadfastly supported, even though he admitted in a December 21 statement, "The health reform debate epitomizes all that frustrates the American people, including me, about Congress and Washington D. C....the national interest has been held hostage to personal and parochial concerns."

Duh!!!!

But Bayh dutifully cast his vote anyway, concluding in his milk toast statement the bill would lower the deficit, keep insurance companies from dropping coverage, and help small business; benefits disputed by the Congressional Budget Office and small business representatives.

Now that Brown's election has caused a major political earthquake in Washington, Bayh is trying to find safe ground to protect his own reelection chances in November. He noted ignoring the message sent by Massachusetts voters could be "catastrophic."

Senator Bayh appears to be finally suffering from a mild case of cold reality.

Fellow blue dog, Sen. Jim Webb, D-VA., who also dutifully voted for the Senate version of healthcare in December, took a different tact, calling for a suspension of any votes on healthcare until Brown is seated. I salute him for that because it is the right and fair thing to do.

On the surface it would appear Bayh and Webb have overdosed on Boniva to strengthen their political spines. It is not hard to get a spine when you know your majority leader and the White House are considering the nuclear option (also known as reconciliation), a maneuver requiring only a simple majority of 51 votes to pass the bill one final time. It is a tactic that might not sit well with most Americans or the Republican opposition, but might offer the spineless likes of Bayh and Webb political cover since their votes may not be needed to approve a bill that threatens to eviscerate the American healthcare system and our pocketbooks.

Bayh had his chance to show courage in December. A bill with which he claimed to find so many faults was, in his words, still better than doing nothing.

Well, doing nothing is what the American public seems to prefer in light of skyrocketing deficits.

I have to wonder if Senator Bayh doesn't regret not doing what we suggested in an earlier blog - that he be the one Democrat to cast the 41st vote against healthcare. Unfortunately for Bayh, Reid, Pelosi and Obama, Scott Brown does promise to be that 41st vote against healthcare, that is, if Harry Reid and company fail at invoking the nuclear option.

Visit my website: Alice A Jackson